1.
Are there any differences between women’s and
men’s language? Give the evidence!
2.
Why do women and men have different language?
Answer:
1.
Yes, there are. There are many differences
between women’s and men’s language in terms of phonology, morphology and
diction.
-
Phonology
In America, the use of palatal velar does not aspire
by women, like kjatsa word (spoken by
a woman) and djatsa (spoken by a
male).
In Scotland, the majority of women using the consonant
/t/ in the word got, not, water, and
so on. Meanwhile, men are more frequently changing consonant /t/ by glottal
consonants do not aspire.
-
Morphology
Lakoff states that women often use the words for
colors, like mauve, beige, magenta,
aquamarine, and lavender are seldom
used by men. In addition, women also often use adjectives such as adorable, charming, divine, lovely, and sweet.
In Javanese, women often use ‘asem’ in mocking something than ‘asu’, while men tend to use ‘asu’ than ‘asem’.
-
Diction
Women have their own vocabulary to show a particular
effect on them. They tend to use words and expressions such as so good, adorable, darling, and fantastic. Besides, English language
makes a difference based on gender specific words such as actor-actress,
waiter, waitress, Mr.-mrs. Another word pairs that show a similar difference is
boy-girl, man-woman, bachelor-spinter and others. This occurs because of the
awareness that different choice of vocabulary is created, describing their
respective roles held by men and women.
In socializing,
usually men are more often talked about
sports, business, politics, formal material,
or taxes. Meanwhile,
the topics discussed by more women lead to
problems of social life, books, food,
beverages, and lifestyle.
Janet holmes in “Women, Men and Politeness (1995: 1-2)
differentiate women’s and men’s language as follows:
Women’s language
|
Men’s language
|
1.
Most women use language to establish,
nurture and develop personal relationships.
|
1.
Men tend to see language more as a tool for
obtaining and conveying information.
|
2.
Women often have to work hard to get them to
talk in the privacy of their homes.
|
2.
Men tend to dominate public talking time.
|
3.
Women emphasis on how their talk affects the
feelings of others.
|
3.
Men’s reasons for talking often focus on the
content of the talk or its outcome.
|
4.
Women compliment and apologize more often
than men.
|
4.
Men compliment and apologize less than
women.
|
2.
Lakoff’s framework used women’s subordinate
social status and relative powerlessness to explain women’s language. Analyses
which take account of the function of features of women’s speech often reveal
women as facilitative and supportive conversationalist, rather than as
unconfident, tentative talkers. Many women also use more standard speech forms.
In using standard forms these women could be seen as responding positively to
their addressee by accommodating to their speech. Women’s greater use of
politeness devices can be regarded as another aspect of their consideration of
the addressee. The differences between women’s and men’s speech behavior not
only refer to the status or power dimension but also the social distance (or
solidarity dimension). Women are solidarity-oriented participants in
interaction. Many of the features which characterize women’s language are positive
politeness devices expressing solidarity.
Holmes suggested four different (though not
mutually exclusive) explanations; the first appeals to social class and its
related status for an explanation, the second refers to women’s role in
society, the third to women’s status as a subordinate group, and the fourth to
the function of speech in expressing masculinity (2001, 157).
No comments:
Post a Comment